The common man is often confused, and, therefore,
disgusted to learn about the myriad uncompromising opinions about religious
issues. There are many who strongly feel that the present tendency of general
aversion to religion among the Muslims owes a great deal to the unyielding
attitude of the scholars. "As it is difficult to find one clear, unchallengeable
verdict on most religious injunctions," the argument goes, "it is difficult to
practise Islam." Although the excuse is hardly acceptable, it does emphasise the
necessity to be correctly informed about the real sources of knowledge in Islam
and the nature of differences in religious opinions so that a correct attitude
about all such questions is adopted.
The original sources of knowledge in Islam are only two,
the Holy Qur’ān and the Sunnah of the Prophet, may Allah be pleased with him.
The fact that these are the only original sources of religious guidance and that
all others are subservient to these can be deduced unquestionably from the
"O believers, obey the messenger and those of you who are
in authority, and if you have a dispute concerning any matter, refer it to Allah
and the messenger if you are believers in Allah and the Last Day." (4:59)
While on the one hand, the above verse stresses upon the
Muslims to obey the leaders of their political system, it also concedes the
possibility of a difference of opinion among the subjects and the rulers, in
which case it has been suggested that a committee of able men should settle the
dispute on the basis of the Qur’ān and the Sunnah (refer it to Allah and the
Messenger). It means that all other authorities, except the Qur’ān and the
Sunnah, are challengeable in Islam; it is only these which form the basis of our
It wouldn't be out of place to mention that the question
as to who is a Muslim and who is not can also be answered from what has been
mentioned above. The late justice Muneer ridiculed Muslim scholarship of his
time on being unable to bring forth a unanimous and an unchallengeable legal
definition of a Muslim in his famous report on the anti-Qadiani movement.
Whether his criticism was justified or not is a different
matter but we can say quite confidently that a person who believes the Qur’ān
and the Sunnah to be the only divine sources of guidance is a Muslim.
Consequently, anyone who adds to or subtracts from these sources, ceases to be
one. Ahmadis, for instance, are non-Muslim because they believe that the
teachings of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad are also an independent and unchallengeable
source of guidance in Islam. Others who, for instance, do not include Sunnah of
the Prophet in the list are, likewise, equally ineligible to be regarded as
There, of course, still remains the unanswered question of
the relative significance of the two. The question, in fact, has been settled
once and for all by the Prophet of Allah himself. While giving final
instructions to Muaz-Ibni-Jabal the governor-designate for Yemen, the Prophet
asked him how he would decide affairs during his tenure. "I will look for
solutions in the Book of Allah and decide," he replied. "But what if you don't
find one there?" was the reply. "I'll then turn to the Sunnah of His Prophet,"
was the reply. "What would you do if even there you don't find an answer?" asked
the Prophet. "I will then use my intellect to solve the problem." The Prophet,
may Allah be pleased with him, was delighted with the answers and he thanked the
Almighty for bestowing his followers with the correct approach for understanding
The above conversation clearly shows that a Muslim must,
for the purpose of guidance, resort to the Qur’ān first and then, in case the
Book is silent on the subject, the Sunnah of the Prophet should be consulted. If
the answer is not discovered even there, he should know that it is one of those
matters which the Almighty wants him to decide on his own in accordance with the
spirit of the two original sources. We may conclude, therefore, that the Holy
Qur’ān is the primary source of knowledge in Islam and the Sunnah although an
independent source of guidance, cannot take precedence over the Holy Book.
Many other sources of knowledge are claimed by some people
to be original. Ijma (unanimous opinion of scholars of a time), however, is by
far the strongest contender. Shaukani, a prominent 12th century scholar, has
rightly pointed out that while on the one hand Ijma even on a single issue is
highly improbable, if not impossible, to take place, on the other the Qur’ānic
verse generally presented for proving the aunthenticity of Ijma as a source of
knowledge has nothing to do with the subject. Whereas Ijma is incorrectly
claimed by people for their opinions to lend additional strength, it can be
stated without fear of contradiction that any opinion backed by a claim of Ijma
can be challenged by bringing forth stronger arguments against it from the
Qur’ān and the Sunnah, the two original sources.
We now take up a more practical problem; What course of
action should Muslims adopt to follow Islam given the many opposing opinions on
various issues. There can, obviously, be no uniformly applicable formula.
Individuals in a society can be divided into at least three broad categories on
the basis of their knowledge of religion and their own mental abilities. There
are some, though always in minority, who have direct access to the original
sources and who possess adequate mental abilities. It is a religious duty of all
such people to practise Islam the way they understand it. They should,
furthermore, inform and guide others on the basis of their opinions.
There are others, always in good number in a healthy
society, who may not have a thorough knowledge of the original religious
arguments. It is imperative on all such people to find the more convincing point
of view on each injunction and practise it.
They may, as a result, find themselves, in many cases,
following different scholars simultaneously. Blindly following only one
authority is completely against religious spirit for all people who belong to
A society can, however, have some individuals who are
mentally less gifted and hence, in no position to weigh the strength of
contesting opinions. Religious arguments, instead of enlightening, confuse them.
Such people have no option but to follow the verdicts of scholars whose
knowledge and piety justify such individuals' confidence in them.