For a common Muslim, there arise many questions in the 
  mind when he tries to understand and practice the Islamic faith. Be it the 
  early inclination towards the creed or a stable general tendency towards it, 
  each stage carries or continues to carry with it various questions regarding 
  religion. These questions take him to different sources of learning to find 
  answers. The response to his questions generally results in two kinds of 
  reactions. If he gets a convincing answer, he will regard that source as a 
  reliable one; otherwise, he may dismiss it as an unreliable source for any 
  religious guidance. Secondly, he may get doubtful over those concepts on which 
  he does not find a satisfying reply; he may consider religion limited in scope 
  because it does not answer all the questions. The fact of the matter is that 
  his questions on Islam generally pertain to the specific category of knowledge 
  which one scholar may be adept at answering whereas some other can only answer 
  it superficially. But a common Muslim regards the one who answered to his 
  satisfaction as the genuine fountain of inspiration, and places the other 
  lower in rank in terms of knowledge. What he fails to understand is the 
  division of Islamic knowledge into different realms. If one can identify and 
  keep in mind the relevant area to which his specific question belongs, he 
  might be consulting multiple sources of knowledge to find the appropriate 
  answers. 
  Like other fields of study, Islamic knowledge can be 
  categorized into various sub-disciplines in which specialization can be 
  pursued. However, this division is mostly scholarly based, and not from the 
  viewpoint of a common Muslim. Hermeneutics, Classical Arabic, Hadith studies, 
  Jurisprudence, and Comparative Religion, etc are the sub-disciplines within 
  Islamic studies but these are mostly scholar-oriented rather than for an 
  ordinary man. Therefore, for the general public these disciplines are of no 
  interest. Moreover, the problem of finding the correct answer is even further 
  worsened when a common Muslim, who is confronted with different questions 
  while on the road to understanding and practicing Islam, takes the scholars 
  and other learned men as the ones who must know each and every facet of Islam. 
  In case he does not find the appropriate answer for his questions from one 
  scholar, he either rejects the learned man, per se, or gets doubtful about 
  religion. From a common man’s point of view, there can be another division 
  within Islamic learning which can be more useful for him. In this regard, I 
  shall discuss three approaches which can simplify this division and be 
  helpful. 
  Considering the general and specific issues which a 
  common man faces during his journey towards Islam, there can be three 
  approaches towards finding the suitable answers for the questions that pop up 
  in mind about Islamic beliefs and practices. One should understand the true 
  nature of his question and refer to a specialist in these individual 
  approaches for the answers. In this regard, the first approach can be called 
  the philosophy-based approach. This approach, basically, addresses the hikmah 
  aspects of the Islamic faith. The concepts of God, the hereafter, man’s place 
  in the universe are few of the many areas of thought to study in this 
  approach. These and other allied aspects provide the theoretical basis of our 
  religion. These concepts will make the larger canvass under which other 
  disciplines and approaches flourish. Is the Universe created by God or it 
  occurred as an accident? If God exists, is He concerned about His creation or 
  not? Is this world a place of trial or an opportunity to enjoy and die? Does 
  God’s attributes have any meaning in our lives. These and many such questions 
  form the very bases of our religious knowledge and subsequent actions. To add 
  more, this approach also focuses on the man-to-man relationships and the 
  different scenarios that emerge consequently, for example, our economic, 
  social and political life. The philosophy-based approach actually gives the 
  general premises and guidelines to start our journey of understanding Islam. 
  So an ordinary Muslim must keep in mind the nature of his question. If he 
  feels that the question is more of an intellectual nature than a practical 
  one, he should try to find a scholar specialized in this area. 
  The second approach towards understanding our faith can 
  be termed as application-based approach. This approach takes into account the 
  application of general concepts and principles which form the true basis of 
  the creed. It gives us ideas to look into specific situations to apply our 
  theoretical knowledge. It invites us to focus on the nitty-gritty of life and 
  answer on the finer and daily routine aspects of human life. For example, it 
  will address the details of various prayers and other forms of worshipping the 
  Lord and their very rationale as well. We study the Prophet’s spiritual life 
  in its minutest details. Furthermore, we study the application of economic, 
  social and political principles and the resultant systems that emerge in a 
  particular period of time. We look into different scenarios that occur in 
  man-to-man relationships, and explore the rationale behind the minutest 
  elements of religion. For example, we may want to know about different 
  economic concepts and Islam’s guidance on such issues. We may like to learn 
  about Islam’s stance on various social customs. Similarly, we may be 
  interested to find Islam’s viewpoint on different political issues. Basically, 
  we endeavour within the purview of shari‘ah and the subsequently resulting 
  jurisprudence. This approach towards answering questions is the most difficult 
  of the route to draw upon. Since the range of situations which can occur in 
  our spiritual, economic, social and political lives are innumerable, so does 
  the huge knowledge-based framework within which that approach asks us to 
  operate. Therefore, if our query pertains to daily activities that we perform 
  in different spheres of life, then a scholar well versed in such issues can be 
  most helpful for answering to our satisfaction.  
  The third approach to finding satisfying answers for our 
  question on Islam may be called training-based approach. This approach, in 
  fact, focuses on the issues that are faced by people when actually practicing 
  religion. They may understand the concepts and applications quite clearly and 
  even have belief in these, but what they need to bring to their life is 
  strength and regularity in their compliance with religion. The training-based 
  approach addresses the problems that people face while saying prayers 
  regularly, complying with the moral code strictly in an immoral environment, 
  or developing a strong and ever- lasting relationship with their Creator. 
  Having kindled a strong belief in God does not mean that one will come up to 
  the expectations that such a belief carries. Believing in the evils of 
  interest-based system in an economy does not ensure one’s strict abstinence 
  from devouring of interest. Understanding the spiritual promise that saying 
  the prayer embodies does not guarantee our regular attendance to it. These are 
  few of the many practical problems that a common Muslim faces even after 
  getting convinced with the truth of the Islamic creed. Those problems can owe 
  their bases to many phenomena. However, the overriding influence is of the 
  environment in which one is brought up, and the atmosphere and ambience in 
  which he works for his livelihood. In such a state of affairs, the 
  training-based approach keeps into account the psychological state of the 
  people, and comes up with such proverbial literature that strengthens the 
  psychological fabric of people to help them follow the path of Islam. The 
  specialist in this area is usually a strict follower of religion himself, and 
  is aware of the down-to-earth practical problems. Their method draws upon 
  religious sources. Their insights into human nature are usually amazing. They 
  usually train people in a certain religious atmosphere so that they may be 
  able to follow religion when they go back to their practical lives. 
  Reviewing the above discourse, we can analyze the 
  difference between a scholarly approach and a user approach towards 
  understanding Islam. A scholar should study Islam based on the academic 
  division of the disciplines but when he addresses people, he should keep in 
  mind user approach. An academic approach should be focused and thorough in the 
  trivial of details. Whereas a user approach should be simple, and should take 
  into account the psyche of the individuals. The three approaches discussed 
  above, if understood properly, can really help people find appropriate answers 
  for their questions. The common blunder one commits is that he asks a 
  philosophical question from a specialist in religious training or a person 
  learned in applications. Similarly, one may ask a practical problem from a 
  scholar whose actual area of work is Islamic philosophy. An analogy here may 
  help to elucidate the matter at hand. The realm of business studies is a fast 
  growing discipline these days. In this field of study, philosophy-based 
  approach may take into account such subjects as the origins of business, 
  business as a social activity, different schools of thought studying business, 
  and the established principles to run a commercial organization. An 
  application-based approach will give birth to many consultants who work with 
  different commercial organizations on different functions, going into minor 
  details on strategy and policy. A training-based approach quite differently 
  will give birth to a breed of trainers who attend to different employees in 
  various organizations and train them to solve the practical problems they 
  confront in their day-to-day lives. One can easily understand the havoc one 
  will play if he asks a trainer about the philosophy of business, and then 
  reject him on finding a not very convincing answer even if he may be a 
  wonderful trainer of business executives. 
  _______________  |